Takže je vymaľované! Súčasný parlament zložený z totálne neschopných politikov skončil. Je úplne namieste povedať, že konečne. Zvádza to konštatovať, že aj fraške je koniec. Lenže… ako možno vidieť z toho, čo sa teraz deje a ako sa títo politici správajú naďalej, vyzerá to skôr na začiatok nového konca. Taký september, aký nás zrejme čaká, nebol ani v Amerike po 11. septembri 2001. Tam spadli len dve budovy, ale u nás hrozí, že padne celý štát… síce len na hubu, ale aj to by malo byť pre obyvateľov Slovenska varovaním.
Stačí sa poobzerať naokolo po predvolebných plagátoch a heslách na nich. Ksichty, čo tu celé roky škodia a neurobili nič z toho, čo nasľubovali predtým, sľubujú ďalej. Jeden hru „mení“, iný ju „nemení“. A „jamkatý“ sľubuje, že všetko bude lacnejšie. Kde bol odteraz? Veď bol aj premiérom! Dokonca vyťahuje kartu o „zodpovednosti politikov“. Doteraz však neprešla a ani nikdy neprejde cez parlament – vlastne cez nich samých. „Hranol“ na „jamkatého“ vyťahuje buzerantstvo a „Balónik“ vyzýva „Hranola“ do súboja, kto má lepších odborníkov. Všimol si azda niekto, aby hocikto iný, mimo SaS, o „Balónikových odborníkoch“ povedal, či napísal, že sú odborníci? Samozrejme, že nie. Toto nehorázne klamstvo šíria o sebe len oni sami . Pripomíname, že ešte nedávno tvrdil, že odbornosť na vrcholných miestach je „na príťaž“, že to všetko musia riadiť „manažéri“. Ale manažér, ktorý o probléme nič nevie, je úplne „nanič“. Viete, ako sa hovorí o odborníkoch a špecialistoch: Špecialista vie všetko o hovne a odborník vie hovno o všetkom. Alebo naopak …? 😊

Ale netýka sa to len „Balónika“, týka sa to všetkých. A netýka sa to len odbornosti, ale najmä toho, kto z nich čo kedy dokázal a najmä ich charakteru. To by mali byť rozhodujúce kritériá na to, aby sme niekomu dovolili nás zastupovať (myslíme tým, v parlamente).
Blíži sa termín ďalších parlamentných volieb a je jedno, či sú predčasné. Znova nás idú tie isté ksichty presviedčať, aby sme volili práve ich. A čo urobí Slovač? Nuž, ako sprosté, tupé stádo pôjde voliť znova tých istých. Veď pamäť nemá žiadnu, sme holubičí národ, ktorý všetko všetkým odpúšťa a tak sme zabudli na výzvu Sama Chalupku ešte z roku 1864 „Mor ho!“. Nemáme už cisára, tak sme si našli na svoje vlastné zotročovanie svojich vlastných ľudí – politikov. Sme ich otrokmi, hračkou v rukách ich moci. Sme presne ako Mimoni zo známeho filmu, ktorí celý čas hľadajú na Zemi toho najhoršieho Zloducha, aby mali koho velebiť a poslúchať. Slovač si tých najhorších zakaždým nájde raz-dva. Nerozumieme, prečo sme my Slováci taký sprostý národ.

Nemá význam rozoberať, koho vlastne voliť. Niet totiž koho. Všetci tu už raz boli a všetci ukázali, že im ide len o ich vlastné blaho. Československo vraj kedysi patrilo medzi najmenej zadlžené štáty. Zvládalo dokonca ekonomicky podporovať Kubu, Vietnam, aj kusisko Afriky. Všetko sme mali zo svojho vlastného vrecka. V pamätnom novembri 1989 sa kričalo, že „Máme holé ruce!“, teraz sa k tomu môžu pridať, že aj „holé rite“. A komu za to vďačíme? Možno by ste povedali, že práve týmto politikom, no nie je to celkom pravda. Vďačíme za to len a len sami sebe, pretože my sme im umožnili robiť si s nami, čo sa im zapáči, či čo sa im v ich chorých hlavách v noci prisnije. Každý robí to, čo sa mu dovolí a my sme im to doteraz dovoľovali. Silne pochybujeme, že by sa to po nadchádzajúcich voľbách zmenilo.

Totiž, každý národ má takú vládu, akú si zaslúži… alebo horšiu.

Tento portál mal slúžiť na to, aby si náš národ uvedomil, kde je skutočná podstata jeho vlastnej biedy, kde sú korene toho zla a aké sú možné cesty z tohto marazmu von. Nezdá sa nám, že by sme boli dosiahli, čo sme zamýšľali. Podľa všetkého sa tu nič nezmení, lebo ľuďom je už všetko jedno.

Ale pamätajte si, nikto nám neurobí tak zle, ako my sami sebe. Na to pamätajte, keď pôjdete v septembri k volebným urnám.

moderátori portálu

By Uncategorized 25 125 komentárov na Parlament … a fajka zhasla“

25 125 Replies to “Parlament … a fajka zhasla“”

  18. Do Greens and crossbenchers who claim that transparency
    and integrity is at the heart of their reason for entering
    Parliament in the first place hear themselves?

    In the past few days they have mounted self-serving arguments against proposed electoral reforms that the
    major parties look set to come together to support.

    The reforms include caps for how much money wealthy individuals can donate, caps
    on the amount candidates can spend in individual electorates to prevent the equivalent of an arms race, and
    a $90million limit on what any party can spend at an election – actually
    less than the major parties currently spend.

    The proposed new laws also include lower disclosure thresholds for donations, thus increasing the transparency of who makes political donations in the first place.

    So the wealthy wont be able to hide behind anonymity while using their cash to influence election outcomes – and
    the extent to which they can use their wealth at all will be limited.

    The bill will further improve transparency by also increasing the speed
    and frequency that disclosures of donations need to be made.

    At present we have the absurd situation in which donations get made – but
    you only find out the details of who has given what to whom many months later, well after elections are
    won and lost.

    In other words, what is broadly being proposed will result in much greater transparency and far less big money
    being injected into campaigning by the wealthy.

    Teal Kylea Tink claimed the major parties were ‚running scared‘ with
    the policy and warned the reform would ‚not stop the rot‘ 

    Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (left) fired a warning shot – saying if it serves only the major parties ‚it’s a rort,
    not reform‘. Teal independent ACT senator David Pocock (right) said:
    ‚What seems to be happening is a major-party stitch-up‘

    Anyone donating more than $1,000 to a political party, as opposed to $16,000 under the current rules, will need to disclose having done so.
    And how much they can donate will be capped.

    Yet the Greens and Teals have quickly condemned the proposed new laws, labeling them a ‚stitch-up‘, ‚outrageous‘ and ‚a rort, not a reform‘. 

    They have lost their collective minds after finding out that Labor’s proposal just might secure
    the support of the opposition.

    I had to double check who was criticising what
    exactly before even starting to write this column.

    Because I had assumed – incorrectly – that these important transparency measures stamping out the influence
    of the wealthy must have been proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens or
    the corruption-fighting Teals, in a united crossbench effort to drag the major
    parties closer to accountability.

    More fool me.

    The bill, designed to clean up a rotten system, is being put forward by Labor
    and is opposed by a growing cabal of crossbenchers.

    It makes you wonder what they have to hide. Put simply, the Greens and Teals doth protest too much on this issue.

    Labor is thought to be trying to muscle out major political donors such as Clive Palmer

    Another potential target of the laws is businessman and Teal
    funder Simon Holmes à Court

    The Greens have taken massive donations in the past, contrary to their
    irregular calls to tighten donations rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt and Senator
    Mehreen Faruqi are pictured)

    The major parties have long complained about the influence the likes of Simon Holmes à Court wields behind the scenes amongst the
    Teals. 

    And we know the Greens have taken massive donations from the wealthy in the past, contrary to their irregular calls
    to tighten donations rules.

    Now that tangible change has been proposed, these bastions of virtue are running a mile from reforms that will
    curtail dark art of political donations.

    The Labor government isn’t even seeking for these transparency rules to
    take effect immediately, by the way. It won’t be some sort of
    quick-paced power play before the next election designed to catch the crossbench out.

    They are aiming for implementation by 2026, giving everyone enough time to
    absorb and understand the changes before preparing
    for them.

    Don’t get me wrong, no deal has yet been done between Labor and the Coalition. I imagine
    the opposition want to go over the laws with
    a fine tooth comb.

    As they should – because it certainly isn’t beyond Labor to include hidden one-party
    advantages in the proposed design which would create loopholes
    only the unions are capable of taking advantage of, therefore disadvantaging the Coalition electorally
    in the years to come.

    But short of such baked-in trickiness scuttling a deal to get these proposed laws implemented, the crossbench should offer their support,
    not cynical opposition, to what is being advocated for.

    They might even be able to offer something worthwhile that could be incorporated
    in the package.

    To not do so exposes their utter hypocrisy and blowhard false commentary about being in politics to ‚clean things up‘.

    Odpovedať

  21. M. Night Shyamalan threw an epic Halloween party in Philadelphia on Saturday night.

    The Sixth Sense director, 54, dressed as the villainous Joker for his ‚Shyamaween‘ bash.

    His makeup was perfectly creepy and his costume was from the 2008 film The
    Dark Knight, which saw the late Heath Ledger play the iconic villain.  

    Shyamalan’s wife, Dr. Bhavna Shyamalan, 55, looked beautiful in an amber-colored, Victorian era
    gown with bats all over it.

    Her makeup was a cross between zombie and goth as she proudly posed next to her talented husband who
    looked adoringly at her.

    M. Night Shyamalan threw an epic Halloween party in Philadelphia on Saturday night

    Read More

    Josh Hartnett draws comparisons between his new
    thriller, Taylor Swift

    The couple’s daughter, Isha Shyamalan, 25, attended the party dressed as a blood-soaked cheerleader. 

    The Shyamalans throw the party annually to benefit the M.

    Night Shyamalan Foundation. 

    The foundation ‚supports the grassroots efforts of emerging leaders as they work
    to eliminate the barriers created by poverty and social
    injustice in their communities,‘ according
    to its website.

    M. Night shot to fame in 1999 with his
    film The Sixth Sense, which celebrated turning 25-years-old in August.

    Shyamalan recently opened up about that film’s impact on his career in an interview
    with People.

    ‚At this point, there’s so many generations of people that have watched [my] different movies,
    ‚ the director said.

    He added that some, people ‚only know me from [2015 movie] The Visit from then on,
    so they don’t even know about The Sixth Sense. So when I think
    about that, it’s wild.‘

    ‚Each movie, I feel this way — that I don’t know if it’ll ever get made.

    I don’t know if I’ll ever get to make another one… „If this is the last one, I want it to just represent me,“‚ he continued.

    Dubbed ‚Shyamaween,‘ the Sixth Sense director, 54, dressed as the Joker
    from the recently released film Joker: Folie à
    Deux starring Lady Gaga and Joaquin Phoenix

    His makeup was perfectly creepy and he wore a woman’s nurse’s uniform to complete his costume

    The couple’s daughter, Isha Shyamalan, 25, attended the party dressed
    as a blood-soaked cheerleader

    The Shyamalans throw the party annually to benefit the M.

    Night Shyamalan Foundation 

    Heath Ledger’s 2008 portrayal of The Joker was M. Night’s
    inspiration for his costume this year

    Shyamalan, who was born in Mahé India but grew up in Penn Valley, Pennsylvania, released two films in the 1990s
    before The Sixth Sense.

    That set off a string a big hits for the filmmaker that
    includes Unbreakable (2000), Signs (2002) and The Village (2004),
    that ultimately ended with the release of Lady In The
    Water (2006), which barely covered the $70 million budget.

    His biggest box office success was with The Sixth Sense, grossing $672.8 million while working
    with a $40 million budget 25 years ago.

    To date, the film made $6.6 million on its first day, including an estimated $2.2
    million from the Thursday night previews.

    Odpovedať

  24. Andrew Cooper Heating And Air really impressed me with their prompt service and expertise!
    Had a great experience with a furnace repair last week. These guys are pros!
    I always recommend this furnace repair company to all my friends Andrew Cooper

    Odpovedať

  31. ใครๆ ก็ต้องการดอกไม้ที่สดใหม่และสวยงามสำหรับโอกาสพิเศษ โชคดีที่ปัจจุบันมีร้านดอกไม้ใกล้ฉันมากมายที่ให้บริการหลากหลาย ไม่ว่าจะเป็นดอกไม้สดสำหรับวันเกิด ร้านเหล่านี้ช่วยเพิ่มความสะดวกสบายอย่างมาก ใครที่กำลังมองหาร้านดอกไม้ใกล้ฉัน ลองดูร้านใกล้บ้านที่มีบริการจัดส่งด่วน อยากรู้ว่าคุณเคยใช้บริการร้านดอกไม้ใกล้ฉันบ้างหรือเปล่า?
    ร้านดอกไม้สำหรับวันพิเศษ

    Odpovedať

  40. nesecito acer esta terea porfavor ayudenme esta muy dificilpero no la puedo hacer
    entonces contestenque necesito hacer esta
    homeworkm haora es para el martes 4 de junio del 2013

    Odpovedať

Pridaj komentár

Vaša e-mailová adresa nebude zverejnená. Vyžadované polia sú označené *